AFR Business

LandWey Investment Limited, a leading Nigerian real estate company uses this medium to update our clients and the general public of unintentional delays in delivery of some of our projects.

As a renowned real estate development company to provide premium lands and modern affordable housing to aspiring homeowners, with notable products to our name, which imbibes uncompromised quality and ISO standards.
In August 2019, we embarked on an ambitious residential project to provide and deliver 2,000 housing units by 2024, a vision we still aim to achieve. Despite the company’s optimism at the start of the project we have been faced with unforeseen circumstances such as the COVID-19 pandemic and its resulting effects, coupled with Nigeria’s fluctuating economic factors and its economic repercussions, causing setbacks of unanticipated delays that have impacted our original timeline for some project delivery.

Despite these challenges, we have remained steadfast in our dedication to our clients, ensuring transparency and constant communication throughout this process. We have proactively engaged with customers, keeping them informed about the evolving situation and the progress of the projects.

We acknowledge the frustration experienced by some clients awaiting the completion of their homes and continue to take proactive steps to address their concerns. We have and still offer various options for those who are unable to wait for the revised delivery timeline, demonstrating our commitment to customer satisfaction and loyalty.

Despite these hurdles, we are glad to have achieved a significant milestone by successfully delivering the first phase of the residential project. This accomplishment is a testament to the company’s unwavering commitment to the project success, quality and excellence. The completion of the first phase serves as a reassuring sign of LandWey’s ability to overcome challenges and deliver on its promises.

Currently, LandWey is diligently working on the second and third phases of the project, with completion dates set for the near future. Our efforts to expedite construction while maintaining high standards showcase the determination to fulfil our commitment to our clients.

The economic fluctuations experienced in Nigeria have undoubtedly posed challenges for LandWey, as they have for many businesses operating in the country. However, our transparency, constant communication, and commitment to finding solutions is the hallmark of our integrity as a brand.

LandWey’s ability to adapt to unforeseen circumstances while staying true to its vision is a test of our tenacity in an uncertain business environment. The company’s dedication to delivering affordable and modern housing options for Nigerians remain unwavering, and delivering on our promise to our clients fuels our tenacity even in the face of these economic challenges.

As the Nigerian real estate market continues to evolve, our resilience and commitment to excellence make us a trusted partner for prospective homeowners. Despite the delays encountered, LandWey is determined to overcome the obstacles and deliver projects that meet the high expectations of our clients.

With the completion of the first phase and progress made on subsequent phases, LandWey continues to prove its capability as a leading residential developer in Nigeria. Our commitment to transparency and proactive measures to address client concerns are a testament to our unwavering dedication to customer satisfaction.

LandWey remains optimistic and determined to overcome the challenges posed by fluctuating economic factors. Our dedication to open communication, flexibility, and the completion of the project in a timely manner will undoubtedly solidify our position as a trusted and reliable developer in the Nigerian real estate market.

We thank our clients for their continued patience, understanding, and unwavering trust in the brand.

Signed: Management.

The Court of Appeal, Lagos has ruled that banks have no right to freeze their customers account without a proper order of court.

The court further ruled that there is no law that confers power on banks to freeze a customer’s account. Justice Sidi Dauda Bage of the appellate court delivered the judgment, upholding the judgment of Justice Iyabo Kasali of Lagos High Court who had delivered the same judgment at the lower court on September 29, 2005. It was in a case that involved Fidelity Bank and a private company, Bayuja Ventures Limited and its Managing Director, Mr Bashir Jamoh. The company and Jamoh were customers of the Apapa branch of the bank. On October 8, 2002, the bank froze the accounts of the plaintiffs by entering a no debit status on the accounts.

The bank alleged that the plaintiffs colluded with its Apapa branch manager, Mr Suleiman Lere, who allegedly defrauded the bank of N30 million, using the plaintiffs account. The bank alleged that the fraud was carried out via a draft and third party cheques belonging to the National Maritime Authority (now NIMASA). The sums were traced to the plaintiffs two accounts. The plaintiffs, however, claimed ignorance of the transactions and further insisted that the branch manager used their account for the fraud without their consent.

At the high court, the bank pleaded three different entries into the account made by Lere, the branch manager. The first was the illegal and unauthorized crediting of the second plaintiff’s evergreen savings account with the sum of N20.6 million by Lere. Others are the fraudulent conversion of three NIMASA cheques in the value of N4.6 million, and crediting it into the account of the first plaintiff; and the complicity of the second plaintiff in obtaining a N30 million draft which was not paid into the either of the accounts.

The plaintiffs, apparently dissatisfied with the action of the bank, filed a suit before the Lagos High Court seeking to order the bank to lift the no debit status placed on its account; the release of N20 million being the balance in the account; and N20 million as general damages.

The suit was filed by their lawyer, Dele Adesina SAN. Justice Kasali, in her judgment, said that there was no evidence to link the plaintiffs with the fraud perpetuated by Lere who was in the employment of the bank. The trial judge referred to the statement of fraudster bank manager in which he exonerated the plaintiffs from the fraud. She further referred to the report of police investigations which also exonerated the plaintiffs. She, therefore, entered judgement in favour of the plaintiffs.

Not satisfied, the bank challenged the decision of the trial court before the Court of Appeal. The appeal filed by the bank’s lawyer, Udom Udom formulated five grounds of appeal which includes the following: " Whether from the documentary and oral evidence placed before the trial court, the appellant proved the respondents complicity defrauding the appellant and benefited from the fraud; " Whether in view of banking practices, rules, and regulations, the sum of N4million transferred from the first respondent’s account to the second respondent’s account by the second respondent on September 30,2002, is a proceed of fraud.

In a unanimous judgement, the panel of justices at the appellate court, Justices Bage, John Inyang Okoro, and Helen Moronkeki Ogunwumiju upheld the decision of the trial court. In the lead judgement read by Justice Bage, the court maintained that the statement of Lere clearly and unequivocally admitted to the commission of the fraud against the appellant.

He also clearly maintained the fact that he committed the crime of using the respondents account without the second respondents knowledge; These are documentary evidence that oral testimonies cannot be admitted to alter, vary, subtract, or added to, especially where such documents brood no ambiguity.

In the final analysis, having resolved the sole issue formulated by the court in the determination of the appeal in favour of the respondents and against the appellant, this appeal is devoid of any merit and it is hereby dismissed . In concurring with the lead judgment, Justice Ogunwumiju said: It amounts to nothing more than a resort to self help which is unacceptable, and which amounts to lawlessness and brigandage for the appellant to unilaterally freeze the account of the respondents.

No one is allowed to resort to self help, if not, we shall all descend to a state of anarchy . In his own concurrence, Justice Okoro said: The procedure in all civilized countries, including Nigeria , is that suspects are reported to law enforcement agencies who, after investigations and if suspect is found culpable, is charged to court. It is only the court that can pronounce a person guilty of a crime. No other institution or individual is endowed with such power.

Let me start by stating that I am a patriotic Nigerian, who, as a loyal and dedicated officer of the National Intelligence Agency, NIA, has never done and will never do anything detrimental to National Security and Integrity of Nigeria. I must confess that, Nigeria: My dear country has done so much for me, for which I have also put in my best, in service throughout my career in the public service. I have no grudge whatsoever against the NIA or the Government as institutions. I owe a lot to my country.

In the last four years or there about, since I left the service of the NIA: albeit unceremoniously, I have been under tremendous pressure from friends and well-wishers, to counter the propaganda being orchestrated by media hirelings of the leadership of the National Intelligence Agency (NIA), against me. But, knowing that, they were mere attempts to cover up the crass ineptitude, nepotism, impunity, tyranny and administrative rascality and impunity, that is taking place at the nation’s apex Intelligence agency, I often did not find it necessary to respond to some of the vile allegations.

Although, it is an open secret that the NIA has been in the press for negative reasons, following my removal as the Ag. Director General and my subsequent illegal dismissal from the NIA, I find it rather strange, that I am being painted as the culprit behind the negative media reports, to the extent that I have been branded a saboteur of National Security, for choosing to remain silent in the face of all the vilifications and pursuing my case in the law Courts. The Federal Court of Appeal has just ruled in my favour on the matter this week.

It is a universal truism, that, when lies are repeated and allowed to fester for too long, without any form of exposure, challenge or contradiction, some gullible minds are bound to believe such lies, as the truth. It is in the face of this fact, and the continuous recirculation of these falsehood, that I have chosen to reluctantly respond to some of the fallacies being repeatedly circulated in the media by individuals by, to the effect that, I have been the masked face behind petitions, or write-ups that pose security risks. Sometimes silence is not golden, especially when it is about protecting ones integrity and countering falsehood.

I take particular exception to one of such unprofessionally scripted piece, entitled: “MOHAMMED DAUDA: UNMASKING THE FACE BEHIND FRIVOLOUS NIA PETITIONS”, co-authored by one Ismaila Iliyasu and Ekenna Ellis Ezenekwe. Both characters in the said piece do appear to be insiders or even staff of the NIA. In the said write up, the authors claimed to have undertaken a painstakingly discreet investigation, and interviewed people who are knowledgeable and authoritative on the subject matter, even as they further claimed to have laid their hands on UNIMPEACHABLE documents.

As a professional; with a verifiable record of tremendous outing, and as a former boss at the NIA, I must confess that I was least impressed, with what I read, as being the accounts of what the writers claimed they discovered. As a matter of fact, that piece was the shabbiest piece of investigation I have ever seen: may be, next to the doctored findings of the so-called investigative panel that sat and recommended my dismissal. If they are indeed NIA staff and that is the kind of intelligence gathered and fed to this country for use in policy planning and direction, then its easier to tell why the country suffers several security breaches from external forces.

It should be embarrassing to masked faces behind the script as their finding, that even records of events which are public knowledge, could not be accurately reflected, especially the claim that, I was appointed as Nigeria’s Ambassador to Chad by President Muhammadu Buhari. Apparently trying to garnish their seeming ignorance, they wrote, “a crucial post in view of our two countries’ close cooperation in the fight against insurgency, he gladly accepted the appointment, even though there were other, more worthy people that President Buhari could have appointed”.

As far as I know, being the appointee in question, and as far as the records show, I was appointed Nigeria’s Ambassador to Chad by former Pres. Goodluck Jonathan in May, 2014. Pres. Buhari could not have appointed me in May 2014, one year before he became the President of Nigeria. At the time of my appointment, I was the D1, Regions at the NIA headquarters: effectively the third in rank, after the then DG, Amb. EO Oladeji and Amb. Ayo Oke. Each time the two were out of town, I had been the one in charge of all operations at the NIA headquarters. There was no other person above me. I will be correct to therefore say, that, nothing could have been farther from the truth, in trying to say there were others more worthy of being appointed. Except the ignorant authors have other basis for qualification outside seniority.

I wish to place it on record that, I had protested the earlier appointment of a female Ambassador, who was lower than me in rank to a neighboring French speaking country before me. I was only pacified with the explanation that, the lady, who had failed her Deputy Directorship exams, once, at the time, was appointed on the insistence of her lover, a former NSA, as a consolation prize, after he failed to get Presidential approval to appoint her as the DG, or even one of the two DDG’s. I also did not understand their concept of worthiness, but it could not have been worse than that of someone who left the NIA as a relatively junior officer, under controversial and shady circumstances, having failed promotion examinations three times consecutively. The same exams that I passed at the first and only sitting. How this "more worthy" guy rebound, dubiously, through the back door, as Head of the Agency, is still inexplicable. May be this abracadabra, or ‘government magic’ according to late Fela Anikulapo Kuti, will be unraveled someday.

The two so-called investigators also claimed to have found out that I emptied the vaults of the NIA, by moving $44 million to another location, without due authorization and before proper audit of our accounts, immediately I was sacked. I recall that, in exhibiting their crass ignorance of the workings of the NIA and the circumstances surrounding that action, a particular analyst, apparently also a hireling of the NIA leadership, had even tried comparing the movement of that money, to a situation in the Central Bank of Nigeria, where the Governor moves money out of the CBN after his or her sack.

As I earlier explained in one of my responses to the National Assembly’s inquiries on the $44million, I wish to reiterate that I moved the money to the office of the National Security Adviser, for three reasons, for safe keep, after Gen Jaafaru, who was sent purposely to NIA, to safe guard the controversial money (which was not actually part of our budgetary allocation), was suddenly withdrawn back to ONSA, and also to create a witness out of it, being the supervisory Office of all Security Agencies, under the law. I knew that to be a big risk, but given the circumstances I found myself in, where highly placed individuals: including those who eventually determined my fate, showed unreserved interest in siphoning the money: by asking me to make available parts of it for their personal uses. I felt the compelling urge to save public funds, by taking it away from the reach of these people (even if temporarily), who were to take charge of the agency following my exit.

It also seems that the authors of that so-called investigative findings were not conversant with the story of how the matter got to the National Assembly, and possibly through the National Assembly into the public domain. Let me state, that, I did not go to the National Assembly on my own volition, neither did I write a petition as they claimed, rather, I was invited (subpoenaed), by a committee of the House on National Security and Intelligence via an invitation letter Ref. No. NASS/HR/8/CT.80/IV/325, of 18th of January, 2018.

Signed by a member of the Committee, Hon. Usman Danjuma Shiddi, the invitation, under the heading “NEED TO INVESTIGATE THE ALLEGED CARTING AWAY OF $44 MILLION FROM NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY (NIA), I was directed to unfailingly appear before the committee, with all relevant documents relating to the issue, on 29th January, 2018 at 1pm.

Let me state for the avoidance of doubt, that, there had been serious pressures mounted on me not to appear before the committee, by people I had mentioned in my earlier report, before another investigative agency, about the $44 million in question. I even received several threats, but I eventually honoured the invitation and made my presentation on oath before the committee, after which, i was asked to submit 17 copies of my presentation to the Committee. Whatever became of the report I made was never known to me. It is, therefore, very unfair and most uncharitable to accuse me of leaking my presentation (which they called petition), to the media or to the public: whichever was the case.

Permit me to place it on record that, I did not write any petition to the National Assembly. I did not leak the contents of my presentation before the Committee to the press or the public, and neither did I ever release documents or postings. As a matter of fact, I do not have access to any NIA documents since my removal in 2018, and I could not have leaked what I did not have. I have been subjected to all sorts of media trials, ostensibly sponsored by the NIA leadership, through sponsored articles and reports: thereby subjecting me to further psychological tortures. The facts about what was happening in the NIA were deliberately shielded from the Government, making its decisions prejudiced against me, just as some public perception has been poisoned against me.

In seeming further display of their ignorance, or out of sheer mischief, the sponsored authors opined that I acted for only one month as Ag. Director General of the NIA. I was there for 54 eventful days from 7th November, 2017 to the date I effectively handed over. But even if I had acted for only one day, there has been no report of my removal attributed to incompetence, corruption or ineptitude, or that the person that they were in a hurry to impose, as my replacement, was better or more qualified than myself. The records of what I did in the agency and their impact on the Agency and its Staffers are a story for another day.

Iliyasu et al also wrote that my appointment was not backed by any formal correspondence in the form of a letter from the Presidency. That is a fact. But just like all my predecessors, appointments of DGs have been seamless, for almost 36 years of the existence of the Agency, at that time. The most senior person automatically steps in. A letter of confirmation usually followed later. It is therefore not an anathema, that I was directed to assume leadership via electronic or verbal message, like others before me. I recalled the same situation with Amb. Uche Okeke, who later served for eight years as DG, I was one of those who conveyed a similar verbal message to him, while he was the Ambassador in Romania, to come down and take charge, following the retirement of his predecessor, Amb. Preware. In the almost 40 years of the existence of the NIA, it was the first time that "the goal post was shifted in the middle of a game." This was just to accommodate an imposter, whose only qualifications is being the President’s Brother.

No one brings a disgraced failure, through the back door to head the NIA. It is the first time that someone who was never a Director or an Ambassador was brought out of forced retirement to lord it over bona fide Directors and Staff of the NIA. May be it is the same game plan that they were preparing for the FORMER RECHARGE CARD seller.

They accused me of shunning the disciplinary committee set up by the present DG to probe me. As an intelligence officer, who has vast contacts within and without the NIA, I was aware that the said disciplinary committee now legally declared illegal, by all the Courts, had a preconceived mission, which was to recommend for my dismissal and to rubbish my career. Looking at the assemblage of the distressed hatchet men coopted to be on the committee (including a convicted self confessed criminal, who stole and refunded more than N500m from Falcon Eye Project, at the ONSA), coupled with the fact that it negated laid down rules as contained in the NIA establishment Act (CAPS 278), 1986, I decided not to glorify their findings by giving it a semblance of legitimacy and fairness, with an attendance.

The coinage, Special Management Staff Disciplinary Committee (SMSDC), was not only strange to our procedures at the NIA, but a negation of the law, just as the assemblage of its members completely fell out of the provisions of the National Securities Act (CAPS 278), 1986: which governs such matters. The Act does not give any retired Director any role in pure administrative schedules at the NIA, to wit recruitment, vetting or discipline, neither does the NSC Act, obliges the agency to continue footing bills for medical checkups, children’s’ school fees, family burials and many others, of officers long after their disengagement, as is presently being done, in addition to hundreds of thousands of Dollars, being shared to Traditional Rulers and family and friends all over the Country, all in the futile efforts of the current to legitimize, what is illegitimate and lauder his badly soiled corruption ridden image.

I will draw my conclusions on this matter by referring to the judgment of the Hon. Judge of the National Industrial Court, while ruling on my suit challenging my purported dismissal; to the effect that implied that an organization, including the NIA cannot create its own laws to try anyone, when the Establishment Act had already made adequate provisions for that requirement. That was the crux of the judgment which, confirmed the Committee as a mere "kangaroo court" and ordered my immediate re-instatement as a Director at the NIA, an order that was unanimously upheld by the Hon. Justices of the Federal Court of Appeal

On the issues raised by the release issued by the NIA(DG/CG/1/VOL.5) of 22nd June, 2023. As usual, I am always the "punching bag’ in their efforts to redeem a battered image. I am already accused of manipulating the FCA judgment, even when I was not present in the Court, where the judgment was delivered, nor was I even in the country. I am even yet to see the CTC of the judgement, as they also admitted, how can I then manipulate the judgement? its outcome or what the press said or wrote. If the media is accused of misrepresentations of the court ruling or published what they understood as the ruling, what then is the truth of what transpired in court from the NIA point? I guess the decent thing by any organisation was to state their positions, after thoroughly studying the CTC and not descend into the acerbic and disgraceful finger pointing.

I can’t be responsible for what the press wrote as their understanding of the judgement. Additionally, it is also absolutely untrue that there is an outstanding or remaining issue that is not adjudicated, as far as the Federal Court of Appeal is concerned. Unfortunately for them, it is the last Court that will deal with this matter. There is no opportunity for manipulation and delay through a court action for another four years. The remaining unadjucated case is just a figment of their own imagination, not in any law court. I guess they will tell our lawyers, which Court the lingering unknown unadjucated is domiciled, when we write to them to demand for the implementation of the Court Order.

I wish to take this opportunity to boldly state, for the avoidance of doubts, that, I have not written or cause to be written, any petition, or press statement: on any matter that may tend to compromise national Security. I left the NIA as it’s Acting DG almost six years ago, and since then, I have not had access to any document or correspondences of the NIA. In any case, I have no reason, at all, to fight my Country, Nigeria or it’s people, just because I disagreed with what I see as a gross injustice, by the former administration. Governments come and go, but the Country remains.

The circumstances that trailed my appointment, and the stormy relationship I had with some very powerful people in that Government, over my refusal to avail public funds for their personal uses and my eventual removal and replacement with the Secretary of the Committee that sought to squander the funds, gave me the impression, that, my remaining as the DG of NIA was a threat to some selfish quests. I was so easily removed for no reason at all, because I had no godfather, working in a Government which is averse to being incorruptible, as I wanted to be. But I leave judgment for posterity.

I know, as a matter of fact, that all the falsehood being bandied about me shall definitely crash, in the fullness of time. In the meantime, my candid advice to the management of the NIA and indeed the sponsors of the callous campaign of calumny against my person, to employ professionalism in handling all matters, and not rely on the mischievous opinions of hirelings, in the desperate attempt to change the flowing narrative about the saga, arising from my purported dismissal.

I will respond to other matters subsequently; now that I have decided to finally open up, if only to correct the erroneous impressions being created about the matter. Truth has only one color, but falsehood has to be garnished in so many forms in addressing issues bordering on injustices and attendant deficiencies in the NIA, as it is.

I remain a patriotic, loyal, and dedicated Nigerian, always willing to salvage my country from the corruption that is eating deep into our national fabric.

God bless you.

Ambassador Mohammed Dauda